tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31147681.post1717656903212387995..comments2024-03-22T08:15:52.097-04:00Comments on BaptistGadfly: Esther 9: 1 PostscriptStephen Garretthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10866698322854892197noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31147681.post-44818295663520627692009-09-05T05:59:46.162-04:002009-09-05T05:59:46.162-04:00Dear Brian:
I suppose it is all in how we define ...Dear Brian:<br /><br />I suppose it is all in how we define the word "respond."<br /><br />Blessings<br /><br />StephenStephen Garretthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10866698322854892197noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31147681.post-50005456682068829692009-09-05T01:15:37.495-04:002009-09-05T01:15:37.495-04:00lol
you said "Your ad hominem remarks are no...lol<br /><br />you said "Your ad hominem remarks are not worth responding to." but by saying that you did respond.Bealhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17962219947906391266noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31147681.post-68884632810790413042009-08-31T08:47:17.515-04:002009-08-31T08:47:17.515-04:00Dear Russ:
"Since Esther is God's Word&q...Dear Russ:<br /><br />"Since Esther is God's Word"? Where did you prove that? I cited John 5: 39 where Jesus defined scripture by its Messianic content. Where have you or Mathis shown that Esther "points to Jesus"?<br /><br />Your ad hominem remarks are not worth responding to.<br /><br />Blessings<br /><br />StephenStephen Garretthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10866698322854892197noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31147681.post-51833506286880391412009-08-31T06:01:31.702-04:002009-08-31T06:01:31.702-04:00Stephen is tragically irrational in his absurd sel...Stephen is tragically irrational in his absurd self-righteousness (contradicting and violating Romans 2 & 1 John 1:10) in pretending to make a case for Esther and Mordecai as the "rebel, disobedient, secular, or worldly Jew" since we weren't there and don't know of their actual thoughts or actions concerning the return from exile, thereby in no way being able to make a case against them without witnesses, just facile speculation. Since Esther is GOD's Word, I'll take that any day over man's any day, especially such pathetic, idle speculation. <br />For the few who take God and HIs Word seriously, David Mathis's Biblical observations of the matter to which Stephen vainly attempted a refutation/reply )at http://www.desiringgod.org/Blog/1976_esther__jesus_the_reverse_occurred/)<br />are Biblically substantial and truly edifying in contrast.Russhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17216069619358775317noreply@blogger.com