A good reason to object to the book, "THE SHACK" is its very questionable theology. While the book is interesting, and even moving in some parts, its theology is way off.
For example, God the Father is represented as a large black woman, and the Holy Spirit as an Asian woman. I have nothing against women, but the Bible, God's Holy Word, prohibits misrepresenting God. In the book, God the Father also dances to rock music.
So, though the author says he wrote the book for his children, it certainly gives false ideas to them about God.
Also, the book's point of departure from what historic evangelicals and fundamentalists consider orthodox theology is found in the chapter called, "The Great Sadness," on page 65 in my copy. Here we are told, "In seminary he (Mack, a key person of the book) had been taught that God had completely stopped any overt communication with moderns, preferring to have them only listen to and follow sacred Scripture, properly interpreted, of course. God's voice had been reduced to paper, and even that paper had to be moderated and deciphered by the proper authorities and intellects. It seemed that direct communication with God was something exclusively for the ancients and uncivilized, while educated Westerners' access to God was mediated and controlled by the intelligentsia. Nobody wanted God in a box, just in a book. Especially an expensive one bound in leather with gilt edges, or was that guilt edges?"
My point from this quote is, once one departs from the orthodox view of Scripture one becomes like a leaf blowing in the wind, and where one ends up is anybody's guess. The Bible itself, in Ephesians 4:14, warns Christians against being carried about by every wind of doctrine. I think the author of the book is blowing in the wind of false doctrine.
Pastor Bruce Oyen
Mar 21, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment